|
|
. |
 |
 he Guardian Poker Column |
|
| |
|
 |
| |
 |
| |
| Victoria
Coren |
| Wed 2 February
2011 |
| |
 |
| |
|
|
|
Poker: At last, I break my Deauville
duck
|
It might have
been an online win, but it still counts
It was the usual story for me at the EPT
Deauville: great tables, brilliant line-ups, couldn't win a bean. I go to that
tournament every year because it's a nice train journey and a beautiful town,
but I've always left poorer than when I arrived. Ugh, almost like a normal
holiday.
But just as the week was ending in gloom, depression and
superstition that Deauville is "unlucky for me", I made a final table and won
$10,500. It was online (in a $109 rebuy tournament with 372 players), so –
like Dorothy in The Wizard of Oz – I could have been at home all along.
But it still happened within the walls of Deauville, so my superstition is
allayed. |
|
|
One hand from that final provoked much
curiosity among the spectators, and triggered several questions on my Twitter
feed. Six-handed, a short-stacked player moved all in for 11,000 and I reraised
to 40,000 from my 190,000 stack. A third player then four-bet to set me all in
and I folded. People were astonished that I would pass with nearly a quarter of
my chips in the pot.
Here is the reason. A player was all in. My
pot-sized reraise indicated that I had a proper hand to knock him out (it was a
pair of tens). The exit of any player was worth $1,000 to everyone remaining.
It would be crazy for a third opponent to bluff or gamble, when he could pass a
wide range – as high as AQ - and jump up the prize ladder. And this
opponent had proved a tight player so far. I felt sure he held one of the four
higher pairs that left me cold. Sure enough, when I passed, he showed JJ.
I'd have been sad if he had 99 or AK. But I am happy with the
reasoning: when facing an all-in, always consider every psychological
factor.victoriacoren.com
|
|
|
| |
 |
| |
|
|
| |
|
. |
|
Main Menu)
